Double Games: Pakistan in the World of Interests
By Ghazi Naeemullah Dar from Tanzania
The world has entered an era where truth, principles, ethics, and laws have become mere words—empty shells used for display. Decisions are no longer based on ideologies or justice but on sheer interests. From international powers to neighborhood streets, from global alliances to the bond between husband and wife, “double games” are being played at every level. These are games where words and actions, intentions and decisions, promises and outcomes all diverge.
*Global Landscape: The War of Interests*
Major world powers like the United States, China, Russia, and the European Union appear to be rivals on the surface, but behind the scenes, they are deeply entangled in trade, deals, agreements, covert relationships, and the “business of destruction.” America, on one hand, labels China as a strategic adversary, while on the other hand, trades billions of dollars with it. Israel and Iran claim to be enemies, yet backdoor dialogues and negotiations continue. Saudi Arabia and Iran have divided the Muslim world into opposing blocs for decades, but during Hajj, they all stand in the same row—a symbolic gesture of unity that is hollow in reality.
*Pakistan and the Art of the Double Game*
Pakistan is located at a fragile geopolitical, political, and economic crossroads. It sits between two major global blocs—America and China—while being surrounded by sensitive neighbors like Iran, Afghanistan, and India. Pakistan’s history reveals a pattern of double games—at times aligning with the U.S., at other times embracing China; sometimes claiming leadership of the Muslim world, while occasionally signaling towards Russia. But the game has never been one-sided. The U.S., China, the Arab world, Afghanistan, and even the Taliban have played their own double games with Pakistan.
Aid was granted to Pakistan, loans were extended, but simultaneously, its economy was weakened, its institutions divided, its youth misled, and its stability attacked through terrorism. Today, numerous foreign intelligence agencies are active within Pakistan, each operating on distinct agendas. The common citizen remains unaware, lost in inflation, unemployment, and despair.
*The Principle and Challenge of the Double Game*
In this world, not only Satan but even the Merciful (Rahman) tests humanity through trials—both forms of the double game. But the difference lies in the rules. The satanic game is rooted in deception, greed, selfishness, and betrayal. The Divine game involves patience, wisdom, truth, and sacrifice. The current global game is undoubtedly satanic—interest-driven, void of character, where puppets have replaced leaders.
*Pakistan’s True Test: Balancing China and the U.S.*
In the current global scenario, Pakistan’s greatest challenge is to maintain a balance between China and the United States—two rival giants. Displeasing the U.S. could lead to economic, political, and military pressure. On the other hand, closeness with China offers opportunities for technology, investment, and economic growth. But since both are adversaries, Pakistan must choose the partner that offers long-term benefits, while tactfully managing its relationship with the other.
*This is the real double game—and Pakistan’s true test* .
The world is at a critical turning point. The Israel-Iran tension and Pakistan-India border skirmishes are but rehearsals for larger wars. Global powers are heading toward major confrontations. Pakistan must play its cards with wisdom, diplomacy, and national unity. There is no room for error. On one side is fire, on the other, a flood of blood. The only way out is elevation—through high-level political strategy, diplomatic finesse, and alliances that prioritize national interest.
This is not the world of Rahman; it is a world ruled by Satan, where interests—not principles—govern. But success belongs to those who, through divine wisdom, secure their interests without compromising self-respect, dignity, or survival. Pakistan must now decide with foresight, not emotions—because this is no longer just about a country, but the survival of a nation.
